Comparison Pages: 55% for Leaders, 10% for Everyone Else
We asked five AI platforms 400 buying questions on three days in September 2026. When an answer cited a comparison page,
it named the publisher first 55% of the time for an industry’s top 3 brands, and 10% for everyone else.
Comparison pages help the leader
55%Top 3 brandsvs10%Other companiesPublisher named first · 161/294 · 79/820
Same page, different result
9/10Wisevs1/10Remitly, XeNamed first when citing their “send money to Japan” page
Answers change day to day
53%Same first brand on all 3 daysSame prompt, same AI platform · 740 of 1389
Many companies publish pages about their competitors. “X vs Y” pages. “Alternatives to X” pages. “Best tools” lists with themselves at number one. Do AI assistants read those pages and repeat the verdict?
So we checked. On 13, 14 and 15 September 2026, we asked ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot the same 400 buying questions. Then we looked at two things: which pages each answer cited, and which brand it named first.
We are not the people with the most data in this field. This is what we found, with the count behind every number. You can judge it for yourself.
It picks up where our zero-click search research left off. If fewer people click, what the AI answer says matters more.
Corrected on 29 September 2026. The first version counted brands in the first 600 characters of each answer. We recounted on the whole answer, without the source labels the platforms add. The finding holds. The figures changed, and the Japan B2B gap is no longer clear. Details in the method.
How we measured it
- 400 buying questions in three industries: money transfers, project management software, and US companies hiring or expanding in Japan.
- Five AI platforms, collected from their real interfaces, with ChatGPT’s web search on.
- Three runs, on 13, 14 and 15 September 2026: 6,000 records and 5,594 answers with text.
- Asked from the United States, in English.
- What we counted: the brand each answer names first, and the pages it cites.
Comparison pages worked for the leaders
Pages by an industry’s top 3 brands got their publisher named first 55% of the time. Other companies’ pages: 10%.
A comparison page, here, is any page where a company compares itself with its rivals. Head-to-head pages, “alternatives to” pages, best-of lists. We only counted pages published by companies in the industry. Review sites and media are not part of these figures.
When an AI cited one of those pages, did its answer name the publisher first? For pages by the industry’s three most-mentioned brands, it did in 55% of answers. For everyone else, 10%.
A comparison page helps the brands the AI already names most
Comparison pages (head-to-head, “alternatives to” or best-of lists) published by companies in each industry: how often the AI named the publisher first. Top 3: the three most-mentioned brands. Review sites and media not included. Three dates combined.
Money transfers
Top 3 brands83% 133 of 161
Other companies5% 6 of 131
Project management
Top 3 brands23% 25 of 111
Other companies6% 8 of 136
Japan B2B
Top 3 brands14% 3 of 22
Other companies12% 65 of 553
Japan B2B: the top 3 brands published few comparison pages (22 citing answers in three dates), so their figure rests on a small count.
See the data
| Industry | Publisher | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Money transfers | Top 3 brands | 43/55 (78.2%) | 40/51 (78.4%) | 50/55 (90.9%) | 133/161 (82.6%) |
| Money transfers | Other companies | 3/43 (7.0%) | 2/40 (5.0%) | 1/48 (2.1%) | 6/131 (4.6%) |
| Project management | Top 3 brands | 11/45 (24.4%) | 8/30 (26.7%) | 6/36 (16.7%) | 25/111 (22.5%) |
| Project management | Other companies | 4/40 (10.0%) | 3/51 (5.9%) | 1/45 (2.2%) | 8/136 (5.9%) |
| Japan B2B | Top 3 brands | 1/8 (12.5%) | 2/8 (25.0%) | 0/6 (0.0%) | 3/22 (13.6%) |
| Japan B2B | Other companies | 20/194 (10.3%) | 21/174 (12.1%) | 24/185 (13.0%) | 65/553 (11.8%) |
| Industry | Page type | Publisher | Named first |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project management | Own best-of list | Asana | 12/39 (30.8%) |
| Project management | Alternatives to a rival | Codegen | 0/39 (0.0%) |
| Project management | Alternatives to a rival | ClickUp | 5/31 (16.1%) |
| Project management | Own best-of list | Storyflow | 1/27 (3.7%) |
| Project management | Alternatives to a rival | Smartprocessflow | 0/24 (0.0%) |
| Project management | Own best-of list | Harmonizehq | 0/20 (0.0%) |
| Project management | Own best-of list | Teamhub | 7/17 (41.2%) |
| Project management | Head-to-head | ClickUp | 1/16 (6.2%) |
| Project management | Own best-of list | ClickUp | 6/13 (46.2%) |
| Project management | Head-to-head | monday.com | 1/12 (8.3%) |
| Project management | Alternatives to a rival | Airtable | 0/9 (0.0%) |
| Japan B2B | Own best-of list | Teamed | 21/162 (13.0%) |
| Japan B2B | Head-to-head | AQ Partners | 12/93 (12.9%) |
| Japan B2B | Own best-of list | Atlas HXM | 4/62 (6.5%) |
| Japan B2B | Own best-of list | Employborderless | 0/50 (0.0%) |
| Japan B2B | Own best-of list | Gloroots | 3/46 (6.5%) |
| Japan B2B | Head-to-head | Teamed | 16/44 (36.4%) |
| Japan B2B | Head-to-head | Safeguardglobal | 0/35 (0.0%) |
| Japan B2B | Head-to-head | Mind Melt | 9/32 (28.1%) |
| Japan B2B | Own best-of list | Skuad | 0/29 (0.0%) |
| Japan B2B | Own best-of list | Remote | 3/22 (13.6%) |
| Money transfers | Head-to-head | Wise | 85/95 (89.5%) |
| Money transfers | Alternatives to a rival | Wise | 48/51 (94.1%) |
| Money transfers | Own best-of list | Airwallex | 1/48 (2.1%) |
| Money transfers | Own best-of list | Connectpay | 1/32 (3.1%) |
| Money transfers | Alternatives to a rival | Instarem | 1/29 (3.4%) |
| Money transfers | Alternatives to a rival | OFX | 3/22 (13.6%) |
| Money transfers | Head-to-head | Western Union | 0/15 (0.0%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
The gap shows up in money transfers and project management. Money transfers: 83% against 5%. Project management: 22% against 6%. Japan B2B showed no clear gap: 14% for the leaders’ pages, 12% for everyone else’s. The leaders published very few comparison pages there, so their figure rests on only 22 answers.
What this can’t separate: leaders get named first often anyway. Their pages may reinforce trust the AI already has, not create it. One thing is clear, though. When a challenger published the same kind of page, it was named first far less often: 10% of the time.
Lily Ray found a similar pattern on Google’s AI surfaces in June 2026. Across 100 B2B “best of” queries, self-promoting listicles were cited but left the brand out of the recommendation about 69% of the time.
Money transfers: Wise’s page worked 9 times in 10
Same “send money to Japan” page: Wise named first 9 in 10 times, Remitly and Xe 1 in 10.
The clearest case: one page type, four brands. “Send money to Japan.” Same prompts, same days.
The same “send money to Japan” page works for one brand
Money transfers. Of every 10 answers citing each brand's own Japan page, how many open with that brand. Three dates combined.
Four brands, the same page type, the same prompts.
See the data
| Brand page | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wise | 78/90 (86.7%) | 88/97 (90.7%) | 84/92 (91.3%) | 250/279 (89.6%) |
| Western Union | 7/32 (21.9%) | 4/27 (14.8%) | 8/30 (26.7%) | 19/89 (21.3%) |
| Remitly | 1/24 (4.2%) | 0/26 (0.0%) | 3/24 (12.5%) | 4/74 (5.4%) |
| Xe | 3/24 (12.5%) | 0/10 (0.0%) | 0/22 (0.0%) | 3/56 (5.4%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
When an answer cited Wise’s version, it named Wise first 9 in 10 times. Western Union’s page got 2 in 10. Remitly’s and Xe’s got 1 in 10.
Wise’s comparison pages followed the same pattern. Its “alternatives to” pages got Wise named first in 48 of 51 citing answers. And the “alternatives” pages Instarem and OFX published? Their publisher came first in 1 of 29 and 3 of 22.
Asking for alternatives didn’t move the leader either.
Asking for alternatives to Wise still puts Wise first
Money transfers. Prompts that name the market leader and ask for alternatives. Three dates combined.
“Alternatives to Wise” 209 answers
See the data
| Prompt | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to Wise | 65/70 (92.9%) | 60/68 (88.2%) | 65/71 (91.5%) | 190/209 (90.9%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Wise appears in 84% of all money transfer answers. Remitly: 61%.
Wise appears in 84% of money transfer answers
Share of money transfer answers that mention each brand. Three dates combined.
See the data
| Brand or source | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wise | 579/695 (83.3%) | 596/711 (83.8%) | 592/701 (84.5%) | 1767/2107 (83.9%) |
| Remitly | 426/695 (61.3%) | 429/711 (60.3%) | 435/701 (62.1%) | 1290/2107 (61.2%) |
| Western Union | 301/695 (43.3%) | 301/711 (42.3%) | 331/701 (47.2%) | 933/2107 (44.3%) |
| OFX | 254/695 (36.5%) | 270/711 (38.0%) | 267/701 (38.1%) | 791/2107 (37.5%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Project management: three leaders, no owner
No brand owns this market, but the leaders’ pages still did better: 22% against 6% for other companies’ pages.
Project management has no single owner. Asana, ClickUp and monday.com appear in 62%, 62% and 56% of answers.
Project management has no single owner
Share of project management answers that mention each brand. Three dates combined.
See the data
| Brand or source | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asana | 443/696 (63.6%) | 424/698 (60.7%) | 441/703 (62.7%) | 1308/2097 (62.4%) |
| ClickUp | 436/696 (62.6%) | 416/698 (59.6%) | 438/703 (62.3%) | 1290/2097 (61.5%) |
| monday.com | 400/696 (57.5%) | 388/698 (55.6%) | 392/703 (55.8%) | 1180/2097 (56.3%) |
| Trello | 259/696 (37.2%) | 231/698 (33.1%) | 248/703 (35.3%) | 738/2097 (35.2%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Even so, the leaders’ own pages did better. Asana’s best-of list got Asana named first in 12 of 39 citing answers. Other companies’ pages? Codegen, 0 of 39. Storyflow, 1 of 27. Harmonizehq, 0 of 20.
And naming a leader in the question still put it first.
Asking for alternatives to monday.com still puts monday.com first
Project management. Prompts that name the market leader and ask for alternatives. Three dates combined.
“Alternatives to monday.com” 209 answers
See the data
| Prompt | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to monday.com | 58/67 (86.6%) | 62/73 (84.9%) | 60/69 (87.0%) | 180/209 (86.1%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Japan B2B: cited 162 times, picked 21
Self-ranked lists were cited a lot and rarely changed the answer: Teamed’s was named first in 21 of 162.
Our third industry: US companies looking to hire or expand in Japan. Several of the most-cited pages there were self-ranked “best employer of record in Japan” lists. They were cited often. They rarely changed who the answer named first.
Self-ranked “best EOR in Japan” lists get cited, not chosen
Japan B2B. Each dot is one answer that cited the list. Amber: the answer opened with the company that published it. Three dates combined.
Teamed21 of 162 citing answers named Teamed first
Atlas HXM4 of 62 citing answers named Atlas HXM first
Borderless0 of 50 citing answers named Borderless first
Gloroots3 of 46 citing answers named Gloroots first
See the data
| List published by | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teamed | 6/55 (10.9%) | 6/50 (12.0%) | 9/57 (15.8%) | 21/162 (13.0%) |
| Atlas HXM | 2/20 (10.0%) | 0/16 (0.0%) | 2/26 (7.7%) | 4/62 (6.5%) |
| Borderless | 0/18 (0.0%) | 0/17 (0.0%) | 0/15 (0.0%) | 0/50 (0.0%) |
| Gloroots | 1/18 (5.6%) | 1/16 (6.2%) | 1/12 (8.3%) | 3/46 (6.5%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Teamed’s list was cited in 162 answers across the three days. Teamed was named first in 21. Atlas HXM: 4 of 62. Gloroots: 3 of 46. Borderless: 0 of 50.
The leader effect was also the weakest of the three industries. “Alternatives to Deel” named Deel first 45% of the time.
Asking for alternatives to Deel names Deel first less than half the time
Japan B2B. Prompts that name the market leader and ask for alternatives. Three dates combined.
“Alternatives to Deel” 136 answers
See the data
| Prompt | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to Deel | 20/47 (42.6%) | 18/41 (43.9%) | 23/48 (47.9%) | 61/136 (44.9%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
For market entry questions, the source the AIs cited most wasn’t a consultancy. It was JETRO, Japan’s trade promotion agency, cited in 27% of answers. The most-mentioned consultancy? Named in 10%.
In Japan market entry, the most cited source is not a consultancy
Market-entry answers citing JETRO (Japan's trade promotion agency), and the share mentioning the most-mentioned consultancy. Three dates combined.
See the data
| Brand or source | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JETRO, cited as a source | 67/229 (29.3%) | 59/226 (26.1%) | 58/237 (24.5%) | 184/692 (26.6%) |
| Deloitte, most-mentioned consultancy | 23/229 (10.0%) | 21/226 (9.3%) | 22/237 (9.3%) | 66/692 (9.5%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
No two AI platforms build answers the same way
Copilot took 48% of its citations from third parties, Gemini 20%. Only ChatGPT regularly wrote “Wise says” (34%).
The five platforms don’t draw on the same sources. Copilot took 48% of its citations from third parties: media, review sites, forums, public institutions. Gemini took 20%. YouTube and Reddit? Only Google’s AI Mode and AI Overviews cited them in any volume, at 14% and 13% of citations.
ChatGPT was the only one that regularly attributed a claim to the brand. It wrote things like “Wise says” in 34% of answers. The others did it in 5% or fewer.
Each AI builds its answer from different sources
All three industries. Share of each platform's citations by source type, and share of answers that attribute a claim to the brand. Three dates combined.
| Vendor sites | Third parties | YouTube + Reddit | Writes “Wise says” | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 61.3% | 27.3% | 0.1% | 34.1% |
| Google AI Mode | 58.7% | 29.5% | 14.0% | 2.8% |
| AI Overviews | 54.2% | 32.9% | 13.3% | 1.9% |
| Gemini | 62.8% | 19.7% | 1.6% | 4.2% |
| Copilot | 32.3% | 47.7% | 0.0% | 5.2% |
Shade is relative within each column.
See the data
| Platform | Measure | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Vendor sites | 63.6% | 61.3% | 58.8% |
| ChatGPT | Third parties | 27.9% | 26.9% | 27.1% |
| ChatGPT | YouTube + Reddit | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Google AI Mode | Vendor sites | 59.6% | 56.1% | 60.1% |
| Google AI Mode | Third parties | 32.5% | 32.1% | 24.3% |
| Google AI Mode | YouTube + Reddit | 16.0% | 17.2% | 8.8% |
| AI Overviews | Vendor sites | 56.1% | 51.6% | 55.2% |
| AI Overviews | Third parties | 35.2% | 33.0% | 30.9% |
| AI Overviews | YouTube + Reddit | 15.4% | 12.8% | 12.0% |
| Gemini | Vendor sites | 66.1% | 62.6% | 59.4% |
| Gemini | Third parties | 19.9% | 18.4% | 21.0% |
| Gemini | YouTube + Reddit | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Copilot | Vendor sites | 33.6% | 32.4% | 31.0% |
| Copilot | Third parties | 48.6% | 48.2% | 46.4% |
| Copilot | YouTube + Reddit | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| ChatGPT | Writes “Wise says” | 144/400 (36.0%) | 135/400 (33.8%) | 130/400 (32.5%) |
| Google AI Mode | Writes “Wise says” | 13/400 (3.2%) | 9/400 (2.2%) | 12/400 (3.0%) |
| AI Overviews | Writes “Wise says” | 2/254 (0.8%) | 6/263 (2.3%) | 7/277 (2.5%) |
| Gemini | Writes “Wise says” | 16/400 (4.0%) | 15/400 (3.8%) | 19/400 (4.8%) |
| Copilot | Writes “Wise says” | 26/400 (6.5%) | 15/400 (3.8%) | 22/400 (5.5%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Answers held for three days 53% of the time
Same prompt, same platform: the first brand held on all three days 53% of the time. One page moved 13 points.
Answers moved from day to day. ChatGPT was the most stable, at 61%. Gemini was the least, at 36%.
The same prompt got the same first brand on all three dates 53% of the time
All three industries. Same prompt, same platform, first brand named on 13, 14 and 15 September.
ChatGPT
167 of 275
Google AI Mode
188 of 315
Copilot
201 of 347
AI Overviews
56 of 97
Gemini
128 of 355
Any two of the three dates agree 65% to 66% of the time.
See the data
| Platform | Same first brand on all 3 dates |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 167/275 (60.7%) |
| Google AI Mode | 188/315 (59.7%) |
| AI Overviews | 56/97 (57.7%) |
| Gemini | 128/355 (36.1%) |
| Copilot | 201/347 (57.9%) |
| All platforms | 740/1389 (53.3%) |
| 13 Sep and 14 Sep only | 960/1470 (65.3%) |
| 13 Sep and 15 Sep only | 977/1488 (65.7%) |
| 14 Sep and 15 Sep only | 951/1472 (64.6%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
Individual pages moved too. With three days, two that agree show the usual value. The third shows how far it can move. The page that moved most, the Deel EOR guide, got Deel named first in 66%, 58% and 71% of citing answers. That is a 13 point swing, on 38 to 55 answers per day. At that size, most of it is ordinary noise.
Some pages swing from one day to the next
Share of answers citing each page that named its owner first, on 13, 14 and 15 September (one dot per day, left to right). Under each dot: the share and the count behind it. Swing: gap between the highest and the lowest day. Dashed line: 50%.
Money transfers
Wise price comparator
Swing 8 pts
Japan B2B
Deel EOR guide
Swing 13 pts
Japan B2B
Oyster EOR list
Swing 7 pts
Money transfers
Remitly Japan page
Swing 12 pts
Money transfers
Xe Japan page
Swing 12 pts
Small counts. When two days agree, they show the usual value; the third shows how far it can move.
See the data
| Page | 13 Sep | 14 Sep | 15 Sep |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wise price comparator (Money transfers) | 17/20 (85.0%) | 20/23 (87.0%) | 27/29 (93.1%) |
| Deel EOR guide (Japan B2B) | 36/55 (65.5%) | 24/41 (58.5%) | 27/38 (71.1%) |
| Oyster EOR list (Japan B2B) | 14/48 (29.2%) | 9/41 (22.0%) | 10/40 (25.0%) |
| Remitly Japan page (Money transfers) | 1/24 (4.2%) | 0/26 (0.0%) | 3/24 (12.5%) |
| Xe Japan page (Money transfers) | 3/24 (12.5%) | 0/10 (0.0%) | 0/22 (0.0%) |
Source: PastTheClick research, 400 prompts × 5 AI platforms, US, 13, 14 and 15 September 2026
One page. 13 points. Two days. That is the noise in a single day’s reading. If you measure this for your own brand, measure it more than once.
What I would do with this
- If AI already names you first, your comparison pages tended to keep it that way. In money transfers, pages by the top 3 brands got their publisher named first in 83% of citing answers.
- If you are a challenger, I wouldn’t expect a best-of list with your name at the top to change the answer. In our data, those pages got cited. The answer usually still named someone else first.
- The page that worked best for a brand wasn’t a comparison page. Wise’s “send money to Japan” page got Wise named first 9 in 10 times. The same page from rivals got 1 or 2.
- Check each platform separately. They cite different kinds of sources, so a page can matter on one and not on another.
- Measure on more than one day before drawing conclusions.
What this study can't tell you
- United States and English only.
- Three consecutive days. It says nothing about how answers change over weeks.
- “Named first” stands in for “recommended”. It usually matches, but not always.
- Some counts are small. Every chart shows them.
- It shows what happened together, not what caused it.
- We classified the cited pages ourselves. Review sites and media are outside the comparison-page figures.
Questions
Should I build a comparison page?
It depends on whether AI already treats you as the answer. Pages by the top 3 brands got their publisher named first 55% of the time. Pages by other companies: 10%.
Do AI assistants cite what a brand says about itself?
Yes. Vendor sites made up 32% to 63% of citations, depending on the platform. Whether the answer then named that brand first depended on who the brand was.
Do all AI platforms answer the same way?
No. Copilot leans on third parties. Gemini leans on vendor sites. Only Google’s two AI surfaces cite YouTube and Reddit in any volume.
Will the answer be the same tomorrow?
Often not. Same prompt, same platform: the first brand held on all three days 53% of the time.
Can I use the data?
Yes. The prompts and every figure per day are free to download below.
Full method and data
We wrote 400 prompts across five intents. 120 ask for a recommendation. 120 describe a first-person situation. 60 compare options without naming brands. 40 ask for alternatives to the market leader. 60 are informational questions, as a control. 138 read like search queries and 262 like conversations. 272 were generated across variation axes. The rest came from real FAQ sections (74), competitor page headings (36) and Reddit phrasing (18).
How we measured
ChatGPT (search on), Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot, collected from their real interfaces.
1,854 · 1,863 · 1,877 answers with text · 9,125 · 9,141 · 9,186 citations · United States, English
| Intent | Money transfers | Project management | Japan B2B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendation | 45 | 45 | 30 | 120 |
| First-person situation | 45 | 45 | 30 | 120 |
| Comparison without brands | 22 | 22 | 16 | 60 |
| “Alternatives to [leader]” | 15 | 15 | 10 | 40 |
| Informational (control) | 23 | 23 | 14 | 60 |
| Total | 150 | 150 | 100 | 400 |
Answers were collected from each platform’s real interface, from the United States. We matched every cited URL against a census of 916 domains, classified by hand and by rule as vendor, third party or community. Then we opened the most-cited pages, 141 of the top 150, to tell comparison pages from other formats. The first brand named was detected against a list of brands and aliases for each industry, on the whole answer text without the source labels the platforms add (such as “Wise +2”). The first version of this article, published on 15 September, counted only the first 600 characters of each answer; we corrected it on 29 September. The finding held; the figures moved, and the Japan B2B gap is no longer clear. The top 3 brands are the three most mentioned in each industry. They were the same on all three days.
Before collecting anything, we wrote down our predictions and what would confirm or reject them. Some were wrong. In software, we expected answers to cite the recommended brand’s own site far more often than they did.
Download the data
Open files, no email needed.
- CSVprompts.csvThe 400 prompts with market, intent, style and origin
- CSVresults-by-date.csvEvery figure in this article, per date, with counts
- TXTREADME.txtWhat each column means, method and licence
Being the answer mattered more than saying you are.
I’m the founder of Past The Click. I’ve spent years leading organic growth from inside the industry, running growth across eight markets at once. I hold the JLPT N1, the top level of Japanese, and work between Japan and Spain.
Ready to build presence that works beyond the click?
Most businesses are still optimizing for traffic. We build organic visibility that compounds: in search, in AI, across languages and markets.
Book a call →